(Adds Wall Street Journal report, comment from senator)
By David Shepardson
WASHINGTON, July 31 (Reuters) - A group of U.S. senators on Wednesday questioned the Federal Aviation Administration oversight of Boeing Co’s 737 MAX as the agency defended the longstanding practice of deferring much of the process of certifying new aircraft to manufacturers.
At a Senate Appropriations subcommittee hearing, the panel’s chair, Republican Susan Collins, and numerous Democrats criticized the FAA’s interaction with Boeing, saying the agency faced pressure from the company to get its new plane approved on schedule.
Boeing’s best-selling jet, the 737 MAX, was grounded globally in March, days after the crash of an Ethiopian Airlines flight that followed a similar Lion Air disaster in Indonesia in October. The two crashes killed 346 people.
“One has to question what has happened to (the FAA’s safety) commitment - whether resource shortages have caused the agency to be too deferential to the aircraft manufacturer and whether it is really wise in the case of Boeing to have allowed the company to certify 96% of its own work,” Collins said, citing a media report that found “safety concerns seemed to be placed second to concerns about Boeing able to meet its own timelines.”
Acting Deputy FAA Administrator Carl Burleson told the panel that while the longstanding practice of delegating authority is not perfect, there were no significant issues. “The fundamental process of how we went about certifying the MAX was sound,” Burleson said.
Senator Jack Reed, the top Democrat on the panel, asked about a Wall Street Journal report that said following the first fatal crash the FAA allowed continued 737 MAX flights despite an agency analysis that found a high likelihood of a future cockpit emergency.
In November, FAA issued an order requiring Boeing to notify pilots about how to deactivate the anti-stall system known as MCAS, but did not immediately require software updates.
Ali Bahrami, the FAA’s associate administrator for aviation safety, told Reed that “from the safety perspective we felt strongly that what we did was adequate.” In hindsight, “maybe we would have to revisit that,” he added.
Boeing said on Wednesday, “FAA’s rigor and regulatory leadership have driven ever-increasing levels of safety over the decades, which has been proven by the extraordinary aviation safety record for more than 20 years.”
Major U.S. airlines have canceled flights into November as a result of the MAX grounding. Boeing said last week it plans to conduct a certification test flight in the “September time frame.” Some officials do not expect the 737 MAX to actually resume flights until early 2020.
Senator Joe Manchin, a Democrat and pilot, said Boeing officials and board members should fly the 737 MAX for a month before the public resumes flights.
“We have relied on the industry more than we should rely on the industry to do the job that we should do to make sure that the American public is safe,” Manchin said.
After the hearing, Collins said she was “surprised” FAA officials disputed concerns on delegating aircraft certification considering documents the committee has reviewed. “They did not seem to think that there were problems at the agency,” she told Reuters.
Last week, U.S. National Transportation Safety Board Chairman Robert Sumwalt said his agency would outline recommendations on the FAA’s aircraft certification procedures by late September.
Federal prosecutors, the Department of Transportation’s inspector general, Congress and several blue-ribbon panels are investigating how the FAA certifies new aircraft.
Deputy FAA Administrator Dan Elwell told Congress in March that the agency would have to spend $1.8 billion and hire 10,000 new employees to handle all aircraft certification internally. (Reporting by David Shepardson in Washington; editing by Matthew Lewis and Bill Berkrot)