* Anti-stall system re-engaged after pilots halted it -sources
* Unclear if pilots reactivated software intentionally
* Software designed to push nose down in different emergency (Adds dateline, details on MCAS function)
By Eric M. Johnson, Tim Hepher and David Shepardson
SEATTLE/PARIS/WASHINGTON, April 3 (Reuters) - Boeing anti-stall software on a doomed Ethiopian Airlines jet re-engaged and pushed the jet downwards after the pilots initially turned it off due to suspect data from an airflow sensor, two people familiar with the matter said.
It was not immediately clear whether the crew intentionally re-deployed the MCAS system, which was designed to push the nose of the 737 MAX down to prevent a stall but which is suspected of exacerbating a different scenario linked to two recent crashes.
A person with knowledge of the aircraft said the system cannot re-activate itself unless prompted by pilots. One possibility is that the crew may have re-activated MCAS in an attempt to reduce the forces on the control column, or because they were unable to adequately trim the plane manually.
Boeing warned against speculation ahead of a preliminary report, while Ethiopian investigators could not be reached for comment.
Boeing’s anti-stall software is at the centre of investigations into last month’s Ethiopian Airlines crash and a Lion Air accident in Indonesia in October.
Ethiopia is due to release its first report on Thursday .
No significant new technical issues have so far emerged in the Ethiopian investigation beyond those already being addressed by Boeing through updated software in the aftermath of the Lion Air crash, a person familiar with the findings said.
People close to the Ethiopian investigation have said the anti-stall software - which automatically pushes the aircraft’s nose down to guard against a loss of lift - was activated by erroneous ‘angle of attack’ data from a single sensor.
The investigation has now turned towards how MCAS was initially disabled by pilots, in line with part of a cockpit checklist procedure, but then appeared to start working again before the jet plunged to the ground, the people said.
A directive issued after the Indonesian crash instructed pilots to use two cut-out switches to disengage the system in the event of problems and then leave them switched off.
Officials briefed on the matter said a key question is when did the pilots at the helm of the Ethiopian Airlines 737 MAX disengage the MCAS system and did they do it too late to regain control of the airplane.
Two people briefed on the matter said the system is not designed to resume operations unless the crew acts and the crew may have unintentionally re-engaged the system as it desperately tried to pull the plane out of its nose-down descent.
They cautioned the data was still being reviewed and that the findings were preliminary.
The U.S. Federal Aviation Administration and National Transportation Safety Board declined to comment.
Boeing is working to submit an upgrade of the software to the U.S. regulators in a couple of weeks and adding extra training.
Investigators will also look at whether the crew carried out procedures in full, including a recommendation to steady the plane’s nose using the trim system before turning software off.
The pilots manoeuvred the plane back upwards at least two times before hitting the stabilizer cut-out switches to disable the system, a person familiar with the matter said.
However, initial flight data indicates the aircraft was flying nose-heavy and not in a “neutral” attitude when pilots hit the stabilizer cutout switches to disable the MCAS system, the person added, making the situation harder to manage.
After the pilots turned off MCAS, the airplane over the next few minutes gained roughly 2,000 feet, but dived into the ground after the MCAS system re-engaged, a source told Reuters.
Safety experts stress accidents are usually caused by a combination of factors and the probe is at an early stage. (Reporting by Eric M. Johnson in Seattle, Tim Hepher in Paris, David Shepardson in Washington, and Jamie Freed in Singapore, Editing by Laurence Frost, Richard Lough, and Rosalba O’Brien)